<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: spikes and HR errors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ergoconsulting.com.au/spikes-and-hr-errors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ergoconsulting.com.au/spikes-and-hr-errors/</link>
	<description>building better businesses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 10:09:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talent and playing to your strenghts &#124; thesquigglyline.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ergoconsulting.com.au/spikes-and-hr-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Talent and playing to your strenghts &#124; thesquigglyline.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ergoconsulting.com.au/?p=559#comment-383</guid>
		<description>[...] Col Duthie posted last week at the Ergo Blog about how HR departments often try to &#8216;fix&#8217; people within their companies by attending to their weaknesses with training programs and development course, when they should really be trying to leverage people for their strengths. I agree with this kind of thinking, but the Gladwell article has served to make me pause before blindly calling halt to working on my weaknesses. What is the best type of talent strategy to leverage your company towards a more innovative organisation? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Col Duthie posted last week at the Ergo Blog about how HR departments often try to &#8216;fix&#8217; people within their companies by attending to their weaknesses with training programs and development course, when they should really be trying to leverage people for their strengths. I agree with this kind of thinking, but the Gladwell article has served to make me pause before blindly calling halt to working on my weaknesses. What is the best type of talent strategy to leverage your company towards a more innovative organisation? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://www.ergoconsulting.com.au/spikes-and-hr-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ergoconsulting.com.au/?p=559#comment-382</guid>
		<description>Hey Col,

Great post mate - I love this line of thinking. I&#039;m not going to rant to much here, but just want to add that the mental model and system many in the HR game come from seems to be dominated by the need to smooth people out by working on weaknesses, rather than &#039;drafting&#039; the right mix of talent into teams requiring a star administrator/marketer/product developer etc etc. 

HR should focus on building communities of talented stars accross functions, so they can fill holes with strengths right awat rather than fill it with the &#039;best candidate&#039; that they can then help shape further. 

A read of the Michael Lewis classis, Moneyball, is a must for folks looking to take this type of approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Col,</p>
<p>Great post mate &#8211; I love this line of thinking. I&#8217;m not going to rant to much here, but just want to add that the mental model and system many in the HR game come from seems to be dominated by the need to smooth people out by working on weaknesses, rather than &#8216;drafting&#8217; the right mix of talent into teams requiring a star administrator/marketer/product developer etc etc. </p>
<p>HR should focus on building communities of talented stars accross functions, so they can fill holes with strengths right awat rather than fill it with the &#8216;best candidate&#8217; that they can then help shape further. </p>
<p>A read of the Michael Lewis classis, Moneyball, is a must for folks looking to take this type of approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralf Lippold</title>
		<link>http://www.ergoconsulting.com.au/spikes-and-hr-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralf Lippold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ergoconsulting.com.au/?p=559#comment-367</guid>
		<description>Col,

Cool posting, I like it as it pretty much reminds me of asking during a presentation, &quot;Why don&#039;t we focus on people&#039;s strengths more?&quot;. The answer was, &quot;Because people&#039;s strengths we don&#039;t have to norish. That is already in the people.&quot; - I was struck and ever since wondered what is going on in organizations and HR departments.

You are bringing up a real point that is still quite common in organizations (especially around HR departments, where you have to bring the number, and it is definitely easier to get a big difference when you start very low -on the weaknesses:-() and people&#039;s heads (mental models):

Get rid of your weaknesses and you become great!

That is definitely not how great teams are established or grown.

PLAYING TO YOUR STRENGTHS is what REALLY COUNTS:-)

Marcus Buckingham&#039;s &quot;Playing to Your Strengths&quot; book (in CD version) is worth a deeper look.

Cheers,

Ralf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Col,</p>
<p>Cool posting, I like it as it pretty much reminds me of asking during a presentation, &#8220;Why don&#8217;t we focus on people&#8217;s strengths more?&#8221;. The answer was, &#8220;Because people&#8217;s strengths we don&#8217;t have to norish. That is already in the people.&#8221; &#8211; I was struck and ever since wondered what is going on in organizations and HR departments.</p>
<p>You are bringing up a real point that is still quite common in organizations (especially around HR departments, where you have to bring the number, and it is definitely easier to get a big difference when you start very low -on the weaknesses:-() and people&#8217;s heads (mental models):</p>
<p>Get rid of your weaknesses and you become great!</p>
<p>That is definitely not how great teams are established or grown.</p>
<p>PLAYING TO YOUR STRENGTHS is what REALLY COUNTS:-)</p>
<p>Marcus Buckingham&#8217;s &#8220;Playing to Your Strengths&#8221; book (in CD version) is worth a deeper look.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Ralf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
